EVOLUTION OF SPOROPHYTES IN BRYOPHYTES
According
to the complexity of structure, the sporophytes of bryophytes may be arranged
in a series between the simples and the most elaborate. The series starts with
the simple sporophyte of Riccia, runs
through that of Sphaerocarpos, Targionia,
Marchantia, Pellia, Anthoceros and finally ends in a highly complex
sporophyte of Funaria and Pogonatum. However, the evolution of
sporophytes has been explained with the help of two theories put forward by
botanist – (a) Theory of Sterilization and (b) Reduction Theory.
1. Theory of
Sterilization:
This
theory was put forward by Bower and was supported by Cavers, Campbell and
Smith. This theory illustrates that a natural advance in the progressive
elaboration and complexity of the sporophyte. The fundamental principle upon
which he formulated his argument is “the
progressive sterilization of the potentially fertile cells (sporogenous
tissue)”. Instead of forming spores and serving a propagative function they
remain sterile. These sterile cells are put to other uses such as nutrition,
support, dehiscence, dispersal, etc. This hypothesis of Bower is called theory of sterilization.
The
detailed process of sterilization of some of the important genera are discussed
as follows –
(a) Riccia
Sporophyte. In Riccia, the zygote
divides and redivides to form a mass of spherical mass of 20-30
undifferentiated cells. Periclinal segmentation forms an inner mass of cells
called endothecium and outer single
layer amphithecium. The amphithecium
forms the single layered capsule wall. The endothecium forms the central mass
of sporogenous tissue. Practically,
all the sporogenous cells are fertile and develop into spores. However, few of
them undergo degeneration to form the nurse
cells.
The sporophyte of Riccia is the simplest among all the bryophytes and has the least amount
of sterile cells. The entire embryo forms the spore producing capsule. There is
no foot and seta. It is just a spore producing organ without any distributing
function.
(b) Marchantia
Sporophyte. Sterilization of the fertile cells is more advanced in this
genus. Half of the embryo derived from the hypobasal region remains sterile. It
forms the foot and the seta. The upper epibasal half is fertile
and forms the spore producing capsule.
The sterile cells elongate, develop spirally thickened walls and become the elaters. A few of the cells of
sporogenous cells at the top may differentiate into sterile, apical cap.
The
capsule of Marchantia has both spore
producing and spore distributing body. It illustrates a step further in the
progressive sterilization of the sporogenous tissue.
(c) Anthoceros
Sporophyte. It illustrates a step further than Riccia and Marchantia in
the progressive sterilization of the potentiality of fertile tissue. The
endothecium cells become completely sterile and forms a group of cells known as
columella. The sporogenous cells arise from the innermost layer of the
amphithecium. It surrounds the columella. The sporogenous cells become
differentiated into spore mother cells
and pseudo-elaters. The archesporium
of Anthoceros is extremely reduced.
The outer amphithecium develops into several cells layer thick capsule wall.
The capsule wall develops a well ventilated photosynthetic tissue protected by
the epidermis.
(d)
Funaria Sporophyte. In Funaria, major portion of the sporophyte remains sterile to form
the foot and the seta. The capsule is differentiated into central column of
endothecium surrounded by many layered amphithecium. The inner layer of the
endothecium forms the sterile columella
and the superficial cells forms the sporogenous
tissue. Thus the archesporium arises from the outermost layer of cells of
the endothecium. It is thus extremely reduced and consists of single layer of
fertile tissue. The amphithecium becomes differentiated into the epidermis, the photosynthetic tissue of the capsule wall and the outer spore sac.
Thus
Bower’s theory of sterilization gives a clear explanation of the evolution of
the sporophyte into upward direction. This theory is more convincing and
reliable.
2. ReductionTheory:
This theory was put forward by Kashyap, Church,
Goebel and Evans. They hold that the evolution of sporophyte has been in
downward direction. They hold the fact that the evolution of sporophyte is
retrogressive evolution. They mainly based their theory on the reduction of
different organs which results in the simplification of the structure of the
sporophyte. On the basis of this view the simplest type of sporophyte of Riccia is considered as the most
advanced one.
The
significant steps in the reduction series are –
(a)
Simplification of the dehiscence apparatus.
(b)
Reduction of the green photosynthetic tissue in the capsule wall.
(c)
Disappearance of stomata and intercellular spaces.
(d)
Increase in the thickness of capsule wall.
(e)
The gradual elimination of seta and foot.
(d)
All these changes are accompanied by the progressive increase in the fertility
of the sporogenous cells. The change eliminates the presence of sterile cells
and elaters in the capsule.
Evidence
from comparative morphology and experimental genetics support the view that the
simple sporophyte of Riccia is an
advanced but a reduced structure.
Very good description.
ReplyDeleteGood
ReplyDeleteThank You for your help.
ReplyDelete